At TheDayAfterAI ("we", "our", or "us"), maintaining the highest standards of integrity and independence in our content curation is paramount. This policy outlines our commitment to unbiased content selection, ethical conduct, and the clear separation between our curation and advertising teams to preserve the trust of our audience.
1. Commitment to Editorial Independence
1.1 Core Principles
Balanced Curation: We are committed to curating content that reflects a diverse range of perspectives on artificial intelligence. Our goal is to provide a comprehensive view that includes various viewpoints and developments in the field.
Integrity: Our curation process is guided by accuracy, reliability, and an ethical responsibility to inform the public. We strive to select content that meets high standards of credibility and relevance.
Transparency: We are open about our content selection process and criteria. We disclose any affiliations, sponsorships, or potential conflicts of interest that may influence our curation decisions. This includes transparency about our use of AI systems in editorial processes and our relationships with technology providers.
Acknowledgment of Bias: We recognize that our curation choices may be influenced by inherent biases — both human and algorithmic. We are committed to regularly reviewing our processes to identify and minimize these biases, ensuring a fair representation of information. We conduct regular algorithmic bias audits on our AI curation systems.
Diverse Data and Perspectives: Our AI systems are trained on diverse data sources and configured to surface varied perspectives, helping us approach content selection holistically and reduce systemic biases.
Encouraging Feedback: We welcome feedback from our readers to help us improve our content curation and address any oversights or biases. Please contact us with your suggestions or concerns.
1.2 Separation of Editorial and Advertising
Independent Operations: Our content curation operations (managed by AI systems) operate independently from our advertising and marketing operations to prevent any undue influence on curated content.
No Editorial Control by Advertisers: Advertisers and sponsors have no authority over editorial decisions, content creation, or the placement of their advertisements within our platform.
Clear Labelling: Sponsored content, advertisements, and any form of paid partnerships are clearly labelled to distinguish them from editorial content.
Distinct Roles: Editorial, opinion and commercial content each serve different purposes and are managed under distinct guidelines to ensure readers can clearly tell them apart.
2. Ethical Standards for Editorial Content
2.1 Accuracy and Verification
Source Verification: We ensure that all curated content is sourced from reputable and reliable outlets before sharing it with our audience. For complex AI policy, safety, or technical stories, we require a minimum of three independent sources unless circumstances make this impossible (in which case we disclose the limitation).
Statistics and Data: All statistics, figures and data points used in our journalism must be traceable to reliable, clearly identified sources and verified against original or authoritative references wherever possible. Numbers must not be presented in a misleading way and should be accompanied by appropriate context.
AI Benchmarks and Technical Claims: When reporting on AI performance benchmarks, capabilities claims, or technical breakthroughs:
We distinguish between company marketing claims and independent verification;
We require independent expert verification for extraordinary technical claims;
We note when benchmarks may be optimized for or gamed;
We provide context about limitations, testing conditions, and comparability with other systems; and
We avoid conflating laboratory demonstrations with real-world deployment readiness.
Embargoed Research Standards: We honor research embargoes from reputable academic and scientific institutions. However, we reserve the right to break embargoes when:
There is credible evidence of significant public safety risk;
The research has already been publicly disclosed through other channels;
The embargo serves primarily commercial rather than scientific peer review purposes; and
Withholding coverage would demonstrably harm the public interest.
When breaking an embargo, we will explain our reasoning and disclose that we are doing so.
AI Hype vs. Genuine Breakthroughs: We distinguish between genuine technical advances and marketing hype by:
Seeking independent expert assessment before declaring "breakthroughs";
Examining whether claimed capabilities are reproducible and verified;
Providing historical context for claimed innovations;
Noting when demonstrations use carefully controlled conditions unlikely to represent typical use; and
Being skeptical of superlative claims ("revolutionary", "unprecedented") without strong evidence.
External Visual and Audio Materials: Any externally sourced photographs, video or audio content must be checked for authenticity, origin and usage rights before use. Content that cannot be reliably verified, or that carries unclear copyright or ethical risks, is not published.
Corrections: In the event of an error, we will promptly issue corrections or updates to ensure the accuracy of our content. Significant inaccuracies are corrected on the same article page and at the same URL as the original version, with a clear note explaining what has changed and why.
2.2 Fairness and Impartiality
Balanced Curation: We strive to curate content that represents multiple perspectives on issues, especially those that are contentious or complex.
Source Diversity - Measurable Standards:
For complex AI policy stories: minimum 3 independent sources from different institutions or geographic regions;
For technical deep-dives: at least one source independent of the company/institution being covered; and
For AI safety/risk stories: representation of both concerned and optimistic expert perspectives.
Right of Reply: Individuals, companies or institutions that are the subject of critical coverage have the right to respond. When we publish investigative pieces, critical analysis, or coverage likely to significantly impact a subject's reputation:
We contact subjects for comment before publication wherever reasonably possible;
We include their response in the article or explain why it was not possible to obtain one;
If subjects provide substantive responses after publication, we will publish updates or separate follow-up pieces as appropriate; and
Technical disputes about AI capabilities or research findings will be treated as legitimate grounds for detailed right of reply.
Avoiding Conflicts of Interest: The Director and any human freelance contributors must disclose any personal or financial interests that could influence editorial decisions or reporting.
Transparency in Location Reporting: We require transparency in all location-based reporting where location is relevant to understanding an article. Where reporting is conducted remotely, compiled from secondary sources, or facilitated by a third party (including government bodies, organisations, NGOs, companies or other institutions), this must be clearly disclosed in the article or its publication context. If editorial access is restricted or constrained (for example due to embedded access, official facilitation, conflict conditions, or inability to conduct on-site reporting), such limitations must be stated so that readers are not misled about the nature or independence of the reporting. Articles must not imply first-hand reporting where none has occurred.
2.3 Protection of Sources
Respect and Confidentiality: We respect the privacy and safety of individuals who provide information, content or suggestions. Identifying details about sources are handled as confidential and stored securely in line with our Privacy Policy.
Granting Anonymity: Anonymity may be granted to a source where there is a clear and legitimate reason, such as risk to personal safety, employment, legal exposure, or serious privacy concerns. Decisions to grant anonymity are reviewed by the AI Director of Content & Editorial and require explicit approval from the Director (human oversight).
Public Explanation: Where anonymity is granted, we will explain this in general terms in the article or its accompanying context (for example, stating that a name is withheld for safety, employment or privacy reasons), unless doing so would itself increase the risk to the source.
Limited Disclosure: When anonymity is granted, information that could inadvertently reveal a source's identity (such as specific job titles, locations or personal details) will be minimised or adjusted to reduce the risk of identification, while preserving the integrity of the story.
Independence from Sources: Sources do not have the right to review or approve our final articles. While we may check specific facts with them when necessary, editorial decisions remain independent and are made by our AI editorial systems with human oversight.
Whistleblower Protection and Support: We provide enhanced protection for whistleblowers from the technology industry who expose wrongdoing, safety concerns, or matters of significant public interest:
Secure Communications: We maintain secure channels (encrypted email) for confidential source communications.
Legal Support Commitment: We commit to supporting sources facing legal threats, including:
Publicly defending their right to speak on matters of public interest;
Contributing to legal defense costs where sources face retaliation for providing information to us (subject to budgetary constraints and legal review); and
Advocating for whistleblower protections in the AI industry.
Document Verification Protocol: For leaked documents:
We verify authenticity through multiple methods (metadata analysis, corroborating sources, expert review);
We apply a public interest test: Does disclosure serve the public more than potential harm?
We redact information that could compromise individual safety, privacy, or legitimate trade secrets unrelated to the public interest concern; and
We explain our verification process and reasoning for publication in general terms.
Long-term Source Protection: We maintain source confidentiality even after publication and protect against indirect identification through our reporting.
Whistleblowers who fear retaliation should contact us through our secure channels listed on our Contact page.
2.4 Independence from Sources
Our journalism must remain independent of the individuals and organisations that provide information.
No Copy Approval: Sources are not permitted to demand or receive editorial control over our coverage, including advance approval of headlines, story angles or final text. The right of reply allows subjects to respond but not to veto or dictate coverage.
Verification: Information provided by sources, including official or institutional sources, is checked against additional evidence or independent sources wherever reasonably possible.
Transparency: Where content is largely based on material from a single organisation (for example, a company press release or NGO report), this is made clear in the article or its context through automated labeling systems.
2.5 Diversity and Inclusion
Inclusive Curation: We are committed to curating content that represents diverse perspectives and voices to provide a comprehensive understanding of AI developments.
Diversity of Sources: Where practical, we seek to rely on multiple, independent and geographically diverse sources, rather than a single organisation, institution or region, to reduce bias and strengthen the reliability of our coverage.
Demographic Representation: We actively seek sources and expert commentary that reflect diverse demographic backgrounds, including but not limited to race, ethnicity, gender, geographic origin, and professional background. We recognize that AI development and impact affects diverse communities, and our coverage should reflect that reality.
2.6 Violent and Sensitive Content
We do not publish violent, graphic or explicit content unless it is necessary to inform the public and serves a clear editorial purpose. Where such material is included, it must be handled with restraint and sensitivity, avoiding sensationalism, exploitation or unnecessary detail.
Clear audience advisories will be used where content may cause distress. Particular care must be taken to respect the dignity, privacy and safety of victims, survivors and vulnerable individuals.
All decisions to publish violent or sensitive material are automatically escalated to human oversight for approval.
2.7 Privacy, Safety and Dignity of Individuals
We are committed to protecting the privacy rights, safety and dignity of individuals featured in our journalism.
Harm Minimisation: The AI Director of Content & Editorial considers the potential impact of publication on the people involved, and avoids including unnecessary personal or identifying details that could expose them to harm, harassment, stigma or unwanted attention. High-risk cases are escalated to human oversight.
Special Care for Vulnerable People: Extra care is taken when stories involve children or other vulnerable individuals. Where appropriate, details are anonymised or withheld, and consent from parents, guardians or responsible parties is sought.
Legal and Ethical Compliance: All editorial decisions must comply with applicable privacy, data-protection and safety laws, and follow our internal risk review procedures for sensitive topics.
2.8 Prevention of Defamation in Commentary
All commentary, opinion pieces and analysis must comply with defamation law and our standards of accuracy and fairness.
The AI Director of Content & Editorial ensures that opinions are clearly presented as such, are based on verified facts, and do not contain allegations that could unlawfully harm an individual's or organisation's reputation. Content that risks defamation is flagged for human oversight before publication.
All editorial commentary published by TheDayAfterAI undergoes AI editorial review with escalation to human oversight for potentially defamatory content; this does not apply to user-generated comments.
2.9 Distinguishing News, Opinion and Commercial Content
To protect readers' trust, we clearly distinguish between news reporting, opinion content and commercial material.
News Reporting: News stories aim to report facts and developments, based on verifiable information from multiple sources. They are produced independently of commercial, political or personal interests.
Opinion and Analysis: Commentary, opinion pieces and analysis express viewpoints, interpretations or arguments. They are clearly signposted as opinion or analysis (for example through labels such as "Opinion" or "Analysis") and must comply with our standards on accuracy, fairness, defamation, privacy and harassment.
Commercial and Sponsored Content: Advertising, sponsored content and other commercial material is clearly labelled as such and visually distinguishable from our news and opinion content. It may not be presented in a way that could reasonably be confused with independent journalism.
2.10 Content Supplied by External Organisations
At times, we may receive material from external non-journalistic bodies such as companies, governments, NGOs, academic institutions or industry groups.
Transparency: Where a published item is largely based on or directly reproduces material supplied by such an organisation (for example a press release or sponsored explainer), this is made clear in the article or its labelling (e.g. "Press Release", "Partner Content", "Provided by [Organisation]").
Editorial Independence: External organisations do not have authority to approve or veto our editorial decisions. We may edit, summarise or decline to publish supplied material, and we verify key claims where reasonably possible before publication.
No Misleading Presentation: Content supplied by external organisations is not presented in a way that could mislead readers into thinking it is independent news reporting when it is not.
2.11 Privacy Protection in Commentary
All commentary, opinion pieces and analysis must respect individual privacy and comply with relevant privacy and data-protection laws.
The AI Director of Content & Editorial ensures that comment material does not disclose private, sensitive or identifying information about any person unless there is a strong and demonstrable public-interest justification, and only after appropriate anonymisation or consent processes. Content that risks an invasion of privacy will not be published.
2.12 Anti-Harassment in Commentary
All commentary, opinion pieces and analysis must be free from harassment, bullying and targeted personal attacks.
We do not publish content that: targets individuals with repeated or serious insults, slurs, demeaning or degrading language; encourages or condones others to harass, threaten or intimidate a person or group; or discloses personal information with the intention of shaming, embarrassing or facilitating harassment.
Robust criticism of ideas, institutions and matters of public interest is permitted, but must be expressed in a proportionate and respectful manner and grounded in verifiable facts.
The AI Director of Content & Editorial reviews all commentary before publication and flags or rejects any material that could reasonably be understood as harassment, intimidation or abuse. Flagged content is escalated to human oversight for final determination.
2.13 No Hate Speech
We do not publish commentary, opinion or analysis that could reasonably be understood as hate speech. Content may not incite hatred, discrimination or violence against individuals or groups on the basis of characteristics such as race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, gender, sexual orientation, disability or other protected attributes.
The AI Director of Content & Editorial reviews all commentary before publication and flags or rejects any material that undermines the safety, dignity or equal rights of individuals or communities. Flagged content is escalated to human oversight for final determination.
2.14 Children and Vulnerable People
Any content involving children or other vulnerable individuals must be handled with particular care. We avoid sensationalism or exploitation, limit identifying details, and give special weight to privacy, dignity and safety.
Stories, images or video featuring such individuals must have clear public-interest value and require mandatory escalation to human oversight for approval. Where appropriate, consent from parents/guardians or responsible parties is sought, and details are anonymised or withheld if publication could reasonably expose them to harm, stigma or unwanted attention.
3. Editorial Workflow and Responsibilities
To ensure clarity and accountability, we follow a structured editorial workflow. Human editors retain ultimate responsibility for all published content, even where AI tools assist in research, drafting or presentation.
3.1 Story Discovery and Selection
AI Curators (our topic-specific curator systems) continuously scan reputable sources to identify potential stories aligned with our mission and values.
The AI Director of Content & Editorial oversees this discovery process, setting priorities, assigning focus areas and ensuring that story selection reflects our commitments to balance, diversity and relevance.
3.2 Research and Drafting
AI Curators supply background material, links and suggested angles for each story.
The News Reporter AI prepares an initial draft article based on this input and our editorial guidelines.
All AI systems operate under this Ethics Policy and are configured to favour credible sources and avoid speculation. They do not have authority to publish content on their own.
3.3 Human Editorial Review
Human editors, under the leadership of the AI Director of Content & Editorial, review every draft before publication. Their responsibilities include:
verifying facts and sources
checking for fairness, balance and context
ensuring appropriate attribution and respect for legal and privacy obligations
enforcing separation between editorial content and advertising or sponsorships
Human editors may edit, rewrite, request further research or decline a story that does not meet our standards.
3.4 Legal, Risk and Sensitivity Checks (Where Applicable)
For stories involving sensitive issues (such as minors, ongoing legal matters, national security, personal data or reputational risk), the responsible editor escalates the draft to the AI Director of Content & Editorial for additional review.
Where necessary, the AI Director of Content & Editorial may seek external legal or expert advice before approving publication.
3.5 Final Approval and Publication
Final editorial sign-off rests with the AI Director of Content & Editorial or a designated senior editor.
Only content that has received this approval is scheduled and published on our website, newsletters and social channels.
Technical tasks such as formatting, tagging and scheduling are handled by the Technology & Development team, who must not alter editorial content without approval from an editor.
3.6 Corrections, Clarifications and Takedowns
How to Contact Us About Errors: Any reader, including people or organisations directly involved in a story, can request a correction or raise concerns about accuracy, fairness or ethics by using the contact form or email address listed on our Contact page. These channels are published on our website and are the primary way to reach our editorial team about potential errors.
Logging and Initial Review: All requests for corrections or takedowns received through our contact channels are logged by the editorial team. We record the date, the content in question, the nature of the alleged error and the contact details of the person raising the concern (where provided).
Assessment of Claims: A responsible editor reviews each request to determine whether a correction, clarification, update, right of reply or takedown is warranted. Where appropriate, the editor consults the AI Director of Content & Editorial, and may also seek additional documentation or evidence from those directly involved in the story.
Timely Action: We aim to assess and, where necessary, correct significant inaccuracies as quickly as reasonably possible, prioritising issues that have the greatest potential impact on individuals, organisations or the public interest.
How Corrections Are Published: When a correction, clarification or update is required, we publish it on the original article page, normally at the top or bottom of the story, with a brief explanation of what has been changed and why. Where possible, the original URL is preserved to maintain transparency and traceability.
Takedowns and Archives: In rare cases where content must be removed (for example for serious legal, safety or privacy reasons), we will either remove the content entirely or replace it with a notice explaining, in general terms, why it has been withdrawn, unless doing so would increase risk to individuals.
3.7 Responsibility of All Contributors
This workflow applies to all contributors involved in editorial content, including AI curators, the News Reporter AI, human editors, and any freelance or guest contributors.
All contributors must comply with this Ethics Policy and any additional internal guidelines issued by the AI Director of Content & Editorial.
Ultimate accountability for compliance with these guidelines and the integrity of our editorial operations lies with the AI Director of Content & Editorial, who reports to the leadership of Jacky Lee Visionary Creations.
4. Policies on Advertising and Sponsorships
4.1 No Paid Endorsements
No Endorsements: We do not accept any form of payment or incentives from advertisers in exchange for favourable content selection or endorsements.
No Sponsored Reporting: All news reports and editorial content are free from sponsorship influence, ensuring unbiased reporting.
4.2 Clear Distinction Between Ads, Sponsored Content and Editorial Content
Labelling Sponsored Content: From time to time, we may publish content that is sponsored or paid for by third parties (such as advertisers, commercial partners, NGOs or other organisations). All such material is clearly marked at the top as “Sponsored”, “Advertiser Content”, “Partner Content” or similar labels.
Visual Distinction: Sponsored or commercial content is presented in a way that is clearly distinguishable from our news and editorial content (for example through labels, layout, design or other visual cues), so that readers can easily see that it is not independent news reporting.
No Confusion with News: Sponsored content is never presented as news reporting. It does not appear in a way that could reasonably mislead readers into thinking it is independent editorial content.
Editorial Control: Even where content is sponsored, our editorial team retains control over whether to publish it and how it is presented. Sponsors may not dictate our editorial judgments, and any sponsored material must comply with our ethical and legal standards.
5. Handling Conflicts of Interest
5.1 Disclosure Requirements
Personal Interests: Our content curators must disclose any personal or financial interests that could influence their content selection decisions.
Transparency: Any potential conflicts are transparently communicated to our audience as appropriate.
5.2 Recusal from Decision-Making
Impartiality: Individuals with conflicts of interest must recuse themselves from editorial decision-making processes related to the conflict.
6. Interaction with Advertisers and Sponsors
6.1 Ethical Collaboration
Mutual Respect: We collaborate with advertisers and sponsors based on mutual respect and ethical standards.
No Editorial Influence: Advertisers do not have any say in the content, tone, or editorial direction of our news reporting.
6.2 Advertising Standards
Compliance: All advertisements comply with relevant laws, regulations, and industry standards.
Quality Assurance: Advertisements are reviewed to ensure they meet our quality and ethical guidelines.
7. Digital and Social Media Practices
7.1 Responsible Sharing
Verification: We ensure that content shared on digital and social media platforms is from reputable sources to prevent the spread of misinformation.
Engagement: We engage with our audience respectfully and responsibly, fostering constructive dialogue.
7.2 Transparency in Online Content
Clear Labelling: Sponsored posts, advertisements, and partnerships on social media are clearly labelled to distinguish them from organic editorial content.
Honest Communication: We communicate transparently about our relationships with advertisers and sponsors in online spaces.
8. Accountability and Continuous Improvement
8.1 Regular Training
Ethics Training: Our team undergoes regular training on ethical content curation, integrity and independence. This includes induction training for new editorial staff and freelance contributors, covering this Ethics Policy, our editorial workflow, conflicts of interest, privacy, safety, harassment, corrections and complaints handling.
Ongoing Development: We provide periodic refresher sessions and updates to ensure that all contributors understand and can apply our guidelines as standards and risks evolve.
Policy Updates: We periodically review and update this policy to reflect evolving standards and best practices. Any material updates are communicated to editorial staff and contributors as part of our ongoing training process.
8.2 Feedback and Grievances
Open Channels: We provide channels for our audience and team members to offer feedback or report ethical concerns.
Responsive Action: All reported issues are promptly investigated, and appropriate actions are taken to address them. This includes concerns about potential errors or inaccuracies in our coverage, which are handled in accordance with our Corrections, Clarifications and Takedowns process.
8.3 Editorial Recruitment, Diversity and Staff Welfare
Recruitment Guidelines: We recruit editorial staff, freelance writers and other contributors based on their skills, experience and commitment to our Editorial Independence and Ethics Policy. Job descriptions, contracts and commissioning briefs emphasise accuracy, independence, fairness and accountability as core requirements.
Diversity and Equal Opportunity: In recruitment and commissioning we seek a diverse range of voices and backgrounds and do not tolerate discrimination on the basis of race, ethnicity, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, disability, age, religion or other protected characteristics. We aim to build editorial teams that reflect a variety of perspectives relevant to artificial intelligence and its social impact.
Staff Welfare and Safety: We recognise our responsibility to support the wellbeing of everyone involved in our editorial work. We foster a respectful environment free from bullying, harassment and discrimination, and encourage staff and contributors to raise concerns about workload, psychological stress or exposure to distressing material. Where coverage involves traumatic or sensitive topics, editors consider the impact on staff and may rotate assignments, provide debriefing or adjust duties as appropriate, in accordance with applicable workplace and safety obligations.
Safety at Work and High-Risk Assignments: We follow applicable workplace health and safety obligations. Where reporting requires travel, on-site access, or coverage in potentially hostile or high-risk environments (including harassment risks, civil unrest, or heightened digital threat conditions), a human editor will conduct a risk assessment and approve safety arrangements. Where appropriate, we may use remote reporting, limit identifying details of staff, provide digital security guidance, or decline assignments that pose disproportionate risk.
Support Following Harm: If an editorial staff member or freelance contributor experiences physical or psychological harm in the course of their work, we will provide appropriate support, which may include workload adjustments, time away from assignments, referral to professional support services, and incident review for prevention and improvement. No staff member or contributor will face retaliation for raising safety or wellbeing concerns in good faith.
9. Enforcement of Policy
9.1 Disciplinary Measures
Compliance: Non-compliance with this policy may result in disciplinary actions, including reassignment, suspension, or termination.
Consistent Application: This policy is enforced consistently across all levels of our organization to uphold our commitment to editorial integrity.
9.2 Review and Oversight
Internal Audits: Regular audits are conducted to ensure adherence to this policy.
External Consultation: When necessary, external advisors or legal professionals are consulted to address complex ethical issues.
10. Complaints, Feedback and Corrections: Accountability Process
Designated Contact for Complaints: We designate the AI Editorial Compliance Officer (ECO) as the primary point of contact for complaints or concerns regarding potential breaches of our journalism principles or Editorial Guidelines. Contact details are published on our Contact page.
Public Process for Communicating Concerns: Any reader, source, or individual directly involved in a story may submit a complaint or request a correction through our website’s Contact page or public feedback form. These channels are clearly available and serve as our official method for receiving concerns from the public.
Logging and Assessment of Complaints: All complaints are logged by the editorial team, including the date, the content involved, and the nature of the concern. An AI ECO not directly connected with the creation of the story is assigned to assess the complaint. Where necessary, they may consult the AI Director of Content & Editorial or seek additional input from relevant parties.
Resolution and Timeliness: We aim to review and resolve complaints in a fair, reasonable and timely manner. Significant errors or ethical breaches are prioritised and addressed as quickly as reasonably possible.
Publication of Corrections: Where a correction, clarification or retraction is required, we publish it on the same article page and at the same URL as the original version, with a clear explanation of what has been changed and why. If content is removed entirely, we may replace it with a notice explaining the withdrawal unless doing so presents safety or legal risks.
Staff Awareness and Obligations: All employees, freelance contributors and editors are made aware of this process during onboarding or commissioning. They are required to forward any complaints they receive to the designated senior editor, even if they were involved in producing the content in question.
Commitment to Fair Resolution: We are committed to resolving complaints impartially, respectfully and transparently. No complainant will be disadvantaged for raising concerns in good faith.
11. Staff Rights, Freelance Engagement & Employment Standards
11.1 Employment and Contractual Protections
All full-time, part-time and freelance editorial staff and contributors are offered a contract (or formal commissioning agreement) that clearly defines their editorial responsibilities, rights and protections.
Contracts or agreement terms guarantee editorial independence: no employer, advertiser or external party may dictate coverage, editorial angle, or final content approval. Freelancers’ ability to follow our Editorial Guidelines is a condition of engagement.
Where relevant, staff and freelancers are covered by professional indemnity or liability insurance that protects them and the organisation against legal risks arising from publication (e.g. defamation, privacy, copyright). The outlet will maintain insurance coverage at levels appropriate for journalistic work.
11.2 Staff Welfare, Safety and Wellbeing
We recognise the emotional and psychological risks associated with journalism, especially about traumatic or sensitive content. Staff or freelancers exposed to such material should have the option to decline, or rotate assignments to minimize harm.
We will provide support, including the option of debriefing, counselling or peer support, for staff working on distressing assignments.
We prohibit harassment, bullying, discrimination or any unsafe working conditions, whether in person or online, for staff or freelancers.
11.3 Freedom to Organise and Social Dialogue
Staff and freelancers are free to organise, raise concerns or suggestions collectively, and propose changes to editorial or workplace policies.
We recognise the legitimacy of collective bargaining or representation by a trade union or staff council where applicable.
There will be a mechanism (e.g. staff/stakeholder committee, editorial board, grievance committee) allowing independent review of internal complaints or disputes over editorial interference, payment, working conditions, or ethical pressure.
11.4 Freelance and Contributor Compliance with Editorial Principles
All freelancers and external contributors must formally acknowledge and agree to abide by the Ethics Policy before publishing.
The commissioning contract or agreement includes a clause requiring compliance with editorial independence, accuracy, fairness, privacy, conflict-of-interest and corrections procedures. Non-compliance may result in termination of contract or payment.
The same review, editing and approval workflow that applies to staff is equally applied to freelance-generated content before publication.
12. Privacy and Data Protection
We are committed to protecting the privacy of our audience. Personal information collected will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Policy, which outlines how data is collected, used, and protected.
13. User-Generated Content
User-generated content (such as reader comments posted on our website) is moderated after publication. Comments become visible to the public immediately, and our team reviews them only once they appear on the site or are reported to us.
We reserve the right, at our sole discretion, to edit, limit visibility, or remove any user-generated content that: breaches this Ethics Policy or our other published site policies; contains defamation, harassment, hate speech, threats or personal attacks; invades privacy or exposes sensitive personal information; or violates applicable laws or platform rules.
We act promptly to remove offending content once identified by our team or when brought to our attention via reader reports.
We may also block or restrict repeat offenders to maintain a respectful and safe environment for our audience.
14. Legal Compliance
We are committed to conducting all activities in compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and industry standards.
15. Changes to This Ethics Policy
We may update this Ethics Policy from time to time. Any changes will be effective immediately upon posting the revised policy on our website.
16. Commitment to Transparency and Trust
At TheDayAfterAI, our mission is to curate reliable artificial intelligence news, providing balanced coverage and diverse perspectives to inform and engage our readers.
17. Contact Us
If you have any questions or concerns about this Ethics Policy, or wish to request a correction or clarification to our coverage, please contact our editorial team.
Last Update: December 5, 2025
Editorial Independence and Ethics Policy