Anthropic CEO Warns AI May Replace 50% of Entry-Level White-Collar Jobs Within Five Years

Image Credit: Saulo Mohana | Splash
Dario Amodei, CEO of leading artificial intelligence firm Anthropic, has issued a warning that artificial intelligence could eliminate up to 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs in fields such as technology, finance, law, and consulting within the next one to five years. Speaking at Anthropic’s recent developer conference in San Francisco, Amodei said this level of disruption could raise U.S. unemployment by as much as 10–20%. His warning comes as AI’s ability to automate tasks traditionally performed by new graduates is rapidly increasing.
Anthropic’s AI Advances and Industry Impact
At the “Code with Claude” conference, Anthropic—backed by Amazon and Google and a principal competitor to OpenAI—showcased its new Claude 4 AI model. Claude 4 is capable of advanced functions such as coding and data analysis with little human input. The company’s demonstration highlighted how generative AI systems are evolving from supporting professionals to potentially replacing them in key cognitive roles.
The World Economic Forum’s 2025 Future of Jobs Report found that 49% of organizations plan to adopt AI-driven business models, while 47% expect to transition employees from roles impacted by technology. Amodei’s warning is notably more severe than most academic and institutional forecasts, such as those by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which predict a slower rate of job displacement due to labour market adaptability and other economic factors.
AI Job Displacement: Amodei’s Outlook
In interviews with Axios and CNN, Amodei explained that AI systems like Claude could automate work such as document summarization, data analysis, and basic coding—tasks that typically make up a large share of entry-level white-collar roles. Amodei suggested that this shift from “AI assisting humans” to “AI replacing humans” could occur within several years, particularly in sectors employing large numbers of new graduates.
A 2025 report from venture capital firm SignalFire noted that major technology companies have reduced graduate hiring by about 50% compared to pre-pandemic levels, with AI adoption cited as a contributing factor. This trend has raised concerns for young professionals entering the job market.
Global and Regional Implications
The potential for AI-driven job disruption has global implications, with particular significance for regions like Australia and Hong Kong. Australia’s technology sector employs approximately 900,000 people and contributes 8.5% of GDP, while financial services in Hong Kong account for about 20% of the city’s GDP—both industries with heavy reliance on entry-level white-collar workers. Amodei has publicly proposed the idea of taxing AI companies to help redistribute economic gains, warning that without intervention, AI-related profits could concentrate among technology firms, worsening inequality and youth unemployment in affected regions.
Balancing AI’s Benefits and Risks
While Amodei’s outlook is cautionary, AI also offers significant opportunities for economic growth. The World Economic Forum projects that AI could generate 11 million new jobs worldwide by 2030, through productivity improvements and new business opportunities. In Australia, for example, AI is expected to drive advances in healthcare diagnostics, while Hong Kong’s fintech industry is leveraging AI to improve financial services.
However, there is a real risk that the speed and scope of AI deployment could outpace efforts to retrain displaced workers, particularly those in cognitive, entry-level roles. The 2025 McKinsey report on AI and the workforce notes that transitions for graduates may be especially challenging, as many retraining pathways focus on manual or technical roles, rather than professional office work.
Counterarguments and Policy Response
While some industry leaders, including billionaire Mark Cuban, argue that AI will ultimately create new jobs as past technological advances have done, economists and policy experts caution that the pace and breadth of AI adoption could make this transition more difficult than previous shifts. Research from Northwestern University and the IMF suggests that labour markets can adapt over time, but that targeted policies and investments in workforce training are needed to mitigate short-term dislocation.
Amodei and other experts have urged governments to increase public awareness, educate lawmakers, and invest in large-scale training programs to prepare workers for AI-driven changes. Australia’s 2024 federal budget includes AU$1 billion for AI innovation, though analysts note that additional resources for retraining are needed. In Hong Kong, the Smart City Blueprint 2.0 promotes AI adoption across the economy but lacks specific plans for job transition support.
Recent polling by Axios shows broad public support for cautious, well-regulated AI integration, reflecting growing concern over workforce impacts and the need for responsible deployment.

We are a leading AI-focused digital news platform, combining AI-generated reporting with human editorial oversight. By aggregating and synthesizing the latest developments in AI — spanning innovation, technology, ethics, policy and business — we deliver timely, accurate and thought-provoking content.